Trump: The Ultimate Social Experiment
Those who have been reading our commentary section know that we generally refrain from excessively political “op-ed” pieces. In order to effectively analyze Evolution 4.0 (and Evolution Ultra) data, it is imperative that we remain politically atheistic. Not to say that we have not done a tremendous amount of research on the current US election cycle, but again, it is imperative that we remain as unbiased as possible. Ergo, we are able to provide a detailed “cause / effect” narrative as opposed to opinion pieces.
One thing we will say, however, is that anyone that has any interest in sociological, geopolitical, or psychological research has to simply marvel at the current election cycle. More specifically, they have to marvel at the profound effect that one Donald J. Trump has had on an entire nation, if not the world. As one might imagine, there are quite a few “theories” about Trump floating around in the alt-news / non corporate media, as well as “main stream” media offices. Therefore, we have done a bit of our own research and have chosen to share some of it here in our commentary section.
Firstly, realize it or not, “The Donald” may represent one of the most comprehensive studies of the American public in the modern era of politics. Around the office we have been using the phrase “one man walking, talking litmus test”. His campaign for the presidency has if nothing else, peeled back the thin veneer of social fabric holding the united states together and exposed just how “group/interest centric polarized” the general populous truly is. More importantly, he has brilliantly capitalized on something we try to keep out of our work as much as possible: “emotion”. Or as we like to say: Emotion, the very nexus of irrational thinking and irrational behavior. Trump, like many notable leaders before him has tapped into a collective disenfranchisement with an entire system, as opposed to specific politicians or “leaders”. Much like we often speak about the difference between “speculative economic failure” and “systemic economic failure”, Trump has capitalized on a collective systemic dis-satisfaction. He has also, and perhaps more importantly, metaphorically taken a chainsaw to the GOP and split it in two.
Based upon Evolution 4.0 research, the GOP has been split 70 / 30 thanks by way of the “Trump Effect”. The 65-70% of “moderate conservatives” who fall more into a category of “fiscal conservative / foreign policy conservative / social libertarian” have truly latched onto Trumps “practical (semi-populist) conservative” stance. His practical, pragmatic, and direct approach has truly struck a chord with them, based upon Evolution 4.0 research. This is especially true with what we have come to call: “designer blue collar / light blue collar” voters. Those “designer blue collar voters” we reference are typically wealthy / affluent, medium to large business owners / working entrepreneurs that include some “millennials”. (Note: “designer blue collar” can also reference some white collar fields whereupon a business owner / entrepreneur is active on a day to day basis”. That leaves the 30-35% of what would be considered “ultra right wing” or the “evangelical / religious right”. We have often heard the phrase “the party of Trump”. As best as we can tell, the “party of Trump” could reference the current Republican Party rebuilt into a more libertarian, secular, non-evangelical conservative party. Effectively what Trump has done, according to our research, is remove the “back to the good old days” religious right from any level of direct relevance. If nothing else, that is what is frightening the 30-35% that have relied on the stale narrative of “unquestionable religion and patriotism” the most. (Some might use the phrase “neo-con”)
Now then, within that 30-35% are some of the most recognizable names in conservative politics. Effectively they have been tossed to the side by Trump within their own party, and at present, Trump continues his largely secular, conservative, populist rampage through this election cycle. In doing so, once again, Trump is conducting something of a giant social litmus test. “How ready is America to step away from religion, and embrace a new united states that is financially conservative but socially libertarian / small government. Based upon the research we have done, we say: Very ready. We should also point out that he has attracted an entire new generation to conservative politics who typically would have either not voted or steered clear of the excessively evangelical / obsolete right wing.
But there is more to the story. Based upon our Evolution 4.0 research, we have seen data indicating that trump is “the man with the blowtorch in a field of fireworks” type of candidate. Jeb bush (much to my laughter) called Trump a “chaos candidate”. (For those that remember our TOC/POC phase, “chaos” is something of a buzz word around here). The fact is that yes, trump is without question a disruptor and a chaos candidate. Almost to the point where we have to wonder if it is intentional. There are a lot of things the Donald has proven to be better at than any other candidate, but at the top of the list is “business-centric economics and stirring the pot”. In other words Trump, according to our research is the ideal president to have in office during the Global Economic Reset. He ticks all the important boxes. “Can ensure maximum polarization and maximum so called purge effect, by “telling it like it is”? Check. Can negotiate an LBO type scenario with China / BRICS nations? Check. Has already and openly taken an anti-sematic stance with largely good results? Check. Ironically, if China/Russia/BRICS were to have a say in who gets elected, Trump is their man. In fact, Evolution 4.0 indicates that there is a fairly good chance that despite the billionaire “funding his own campaign”, sizable amounts of campaign contributions are likely coming from overseas sources (most notably China). I have personally dealt with wealthy individuals enough to say that if they can use someone else’s money, they will… how do you think they got that wealthy in the first place. It’s not a question of “they can’t afford it” but rather they tend to use a business model that has proven successful time and time again. Mitigate capital exposure / risk by using “OPM”: Other peoples’ money”.
The big question: “Is Donald Trump controlled opposition”? Based upon our research, that is something of a “grey area” answer. Certainly not controlled by any political party in the united states, that much we can say with a great deal of certainty. However, in terms of international interest, is it possible that he is a “BRICS / one world system ringer”, that is, once again according to Evolution 4.0, a very real possibility. Important caveat: Trump above all else is an “opportunist”. In other words, he “makes his own opportunities”. We have researched extensively and have come to the conclusion that it is possible that Trump started out as controlled opposition for either the Republican or Democrat party (pending a “deal”). Either A: running interference for the Hillary campaign or B: ensuring that the republicans lose “without looking like they are losing on purpose”, to prevent having a republican in office during the GER at all. We have analyzed enough Evolution 4.0 information to suggest that such a “deal” never came to fruition from either “side”. They either “waited too long” or tried to back out of a pre-arranged deal. Keep in mind the Trump mentality of “winning”. Those with Trumps’ mentality will not enter into a situation unless there is all but a guaranteed a desirable outcome.
In the situation that we analyzed, he would get a national platform for a given period of time to express his idea of leadership, a large sum of money ("winning"), and then would “go away”. In other words, ultimate self promotion/ relevance publicity stunt and a financial windfall.
As far as our information indicates, the most likely scenario is as such: He realized he can really win. If one or both sides “welched” on an arrangement and he discovered he can win, a phone call or two would ensure ultimate financial support from China, and other international business entities. Once again, as best as we have been able to discover, he realized he can really win.
At the time of the writing of this piece, here is what we can offer our listeners:
Option 1: Trump wins the GOP nomination, which looks to be statistically probable at this point. His demeanor / mannerisms during a general election debate will be “the tell” to use a poker term. Invariably the “Clinton camp” is preparing for Donalds WWE style of “over the top of the head with a sledge hammer” approach to debates. If Trump shows up in a far more professional, affable, though equally (if not more) intense format, then he’s playing for keeps so to speak. In other words, all the intensity of the primary debates but with a more organized / factual / substantial presentation… then we are seeing the “Presidential version” of Trump which could prove devastating for the likely Clinton / Sanders ticket.
Option 2: There is so much resistance from the GOP that Trump chooses to run as an independent candidate. Evolution 4.0 indicates that such a last minute switch is well within statistical ranges to say “yes that could likely happen”. If so, it has been indicated by Evolution 4.0 that New Jersey governor Chris Christie would likely be his running mate on a truly independent ticket. (The combination of the two is not something the RNC would allow). Though many would say that such a move would “guarantee Hillary a win”, it is possible that a Trump/Christie ticket would acquire enough undecided and have not voted before voters to win.
Option 2A: The same as above though Trump/Christie lose and uses the additional time to construct a true independent third party for the 2020 race. Also known as the “nightmare scenario” for the current “two party” system. Keep in mind that would include a complete likely “bungling” of the GER by a democrat president.
Therefore, based upon our analysis: “Trump wins either way”. He has already done a tremendous amount of damage to the two party system as much as he has to the GOP and really anyone else in his way. He has also had a profound effect on the American public. Simply because a candidate “goes away” does not mean that the sentiment that he stirred does too.
In terms of this election cycle, we will also say that during our TOC/POC phase we predicted an “easy win” for Jeb Bush. What has since transpired so far in terms of Trump we will say falls into what we will readily call “black swan” territory. Ironically with all the comparisons to Hitler being made, we did go on record in 2014 on the Haggmann Report saying that a rise of a so called “super tyrant” within two years was “inevitable”.
For those interested in a more detailed analysis, we do encourage you to subscribe to WireHaus, our monthly publication. In the Feb/March “super issue”, we delve deeper into the sociological effects of Trumps “candidacy” (and potential Presidency). We also explore if the world is leaning towards the age of something we have come to call “species centric tyranny”. In the same issue we share research if Trump is a "preview" or "someone who is clearing a path" for another version of a Trump-like character in the future.
**Stay tuned to Evolution's Commentary section for research information on "nationalism, the first step towards a species-centric one world system" analysis.
